Legal Opinion

Hutchinson v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 2004No. C3-02-1961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

In this case we are asked to decide whether, under Fiore v. White, 531 U.S. 225, 121 S.Ct. 712, 148 L.Ed.2d 629 (2001) (per curiam), our holding in State v. Misquadace, 644 N.W.2d 65 (Minn.2002), which we expressly applied to pending and future cases, should instead apply from the effective date of an amendment to Minn. Stat. § 244.09 in 1997.

William Hutchinson, the appellant, was charged with third-degree criminal sexual conduct and terroristic threats in connection with an incident involving his girlfriend, who had obtained an order for protection against him. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Fiore v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. MisquadaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Bunkley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Moua v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. AmundsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  5. State v. PetschlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API