Legal Opinion

State v. Burrell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 2, 2013No. A11-1517PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

Appellant Mark Myrl Burrell filed a direct appeal challenging his forgery convictions. While his direct appeal was pending in the Minnesota Court of Appeals, Burrell died. Defense counsel filed a motion to abate the prosecution ab initio, arguing that Burrell’s death required the court of appeals to vacate the convictions and remand to the district court with instructions to dismiss the complaint. After denying the abatement motion, the court of appeals dismissed the appeal. Because we conclude that a prosecution should abate ab initio when the defendant dies…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Durham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Dove v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. People v. MattesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HollisterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. HernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
  3. State of Arizona v. Richard Allen ReedArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  4. People v. GriffinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. State v. KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API