Legal Opinion

Bunkley v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 2003No. 02-8636PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Per curiam

Clyde Timothy Bunkley petitions for a writ of certiorari, arguing that the Florida Supreme Court contradicted the principles of this Court’s decision in Fiore v. White, 531 U. S. 225 (2001) (per curiam), when it failed to determine whether the “common pocketknife” exception to Florida’s definition of a ‘“[w]eapon’” encompassed Bunkley’s pocketknife at the time that his conviction became final in 1989. Fla. Stat. §790.001(13) (2000). We agree, and therefore grant Bunkley’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and his petition for a writ of certiorari.

1=1

In the early morning hours of April…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Fiore v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. L.B. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  4. Bunkley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. Bunkley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Gladney v. PollardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Phuoc Nguyen v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Dale E. Schardt v. Alice PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API