Legal Opinion
Panama Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided August 17, 1936No. 594PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit is in equity. The hearing is on application for interlocutory injunction against respondents, members of the Railroad Commission. The claim is that under the authority of rules and orders the Commission has, wholly without jurisdiction, made requirements and exactions of complainants in regard to intrastate shipments of crude oil and products imported by it from the Rodessa field in Louisiana. The prayer is for an injunction mandatory and preventive, ordering respondents to issue the necessary tenders or certificates for the shipment of crude petroleum now on…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Porter v. Investors SyndicateSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Red "C" Oil Manufacturing Co. v. Board of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State Corporation Comm'n of Kan. v. Wichita Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Mintz v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thompson v. SpearCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Johnson v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1936