Legal Opinion

Melton v. Railroad Commission of Texas

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided April 29, 1935No. 509PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

By bill filed March 26th, plaintiff complains of the Commission’s so-called tender or permit rules, requiring persons proposing to ship petroleum products to show that they were processed from legally produced oil. He sues the Railroad Commission and. the Attorney General primarily, and inci•dentally joins in the suit railroad companies which he alleges have refused to ship his oil because of threats oí prosecution if they do it without a Commission permit. ITe seeks an interlocutory and a final injunction, restraining the Commission and the Attorney General from enforcing against him the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Fenner v. BoykinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whittington v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1936
  2. Lacy v. Railroad CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1935
  3. Tysco Oil Co. v. Railroad Commission of TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1935
  4. Thompson v. SpearCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  5. President of United States v. Artex Refineries Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API