Argentinis v. Gould
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a builder’s breach of a construction contract by failure of substantial performance permits the non-breaching owner to collect damages unreduced by the outstanding balance of the contract price that the owner avoids paying by virtue of the breach. We conclude that the failure so to reduce an owner’s damages affords the owner an unconscionable recovery in excess of his actual loss suffered by reason of the breach. Accordingly, we reverse the contrary judgment of the Appellate Court only as to the amount of the judgment.
The facts are as follows.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Vines v. Orchard Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Levesque v. D & M BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Argentinis v. GouldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Edens v. Kole Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Magnet Resources v. Summit MRI, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Maloney v. PCRE, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Miller v. BourgoinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Brown v. Rawlings Financial Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.