Legal Opinion
Ames v. Commissioner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 3, 2004No. SC 16831PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
Under General Statutes § 14-52,1 an automobile dealer is required to furnish a surety bond in *526the amount of $20,000 as indemnity for any loss sustained by any person as a result of any acts of the dealer constituting grounds for the suspension or revocation of the dealer’s license to sell or repair automobiles or as a result of such dealer’s going out of business. The sole issue raised by this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that a surety bond furnished in accordance with § 14-52 does not provide indemnity for that portion of a civil…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Winchester Woods Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Alaimo v. RoyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Harty v. Cantor Fitzgerald and Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Cruz v. MontanezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. Kirk R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.