Peacock v. Stinchcomb
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Ionia; Davis, J. Bill by Thomas L. Peacock against Theseus E„ Stinchcomb and another for an injunction. From a, decree for complainant; defendants'appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
In this cause the bill of complaint was: filed to obtain an injunction restraining defendant Stinchcomb from maintaining a certain drain constructed by him, and from discharging waters through the same upon the lands of the complainant, and re*302straining each and both of said defendants from constructing any drain upon the lands of defendant Chamblin, whereby the waters from his land would be brought, or carried, therefrom upon the lands of said complainant.
Counsel have not furnished us with any plat or map of the premises involved, rendering it necessary to refer to descriptions thereof and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chapel v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Cranson v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Township of Merritt v. HarpMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Bruggink v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Smith v. Township of EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kernen v. Homestead Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- City of Mountain Brook v. BeattySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Bennett v. County of EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Ruehs v. SchantzMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.