Legal Opinion

Kernen v. Homestead Development Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1999No. Docket 205879PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Young, Jr., J.

Plaintiffs appeal as of right an order denying their request for a permanent injunction that would prohibit defendant from discharging treated wastewater into a wetland on its property, which wastewater would then flow south into a wetland located on plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs also appeal the trial court’s decision to apportion costs. Defendant cross appeals the trial court’s grant of summary disposition to plaintiffs with regard to their claim that the proposed discharge would constitute a trespass. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. FACTUAL and procedural background

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hasselbring v. KoepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Thies v. HowlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Attorney General ex rel. Township of Wyoming v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. City of BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Pontiac Fire Fighters Union Local 376 v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Barrow v. City of Detroit Election CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Taylor v. CurrieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Davis v. City of Detroit Financial Review TeamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API