Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. City of Burton

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 2011No. Docket No. 293023PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs Charles D. Wiggins and Susan Wiggins (the Wiggins) appeal by right the circuit court’s order denying their motion for summary disposition, granting summary disposition in favor of defendants William L. Mahler and Paula M. Mahler (the Mahlers), granting summary disposition in favor of defendants Thomas A. Heckman and Margaret A. Heckman (the Heckmans), and dismissing all claims against the city of Burton (the City) “without prejudice so that the [Wiggins] and the City... can follow the procedure ... laid out in MCL 280.75.” The City cross-appeals the same circuit court order. We…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Tuscany Grove Association v. PerainoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Charles A. Murray Trust v. FutrellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Janet Travis, Inc. v. Preka Holdings, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Moher v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
  5. Morse v. ColittiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API