Legal Opinion

Ruehs v. Schantz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1944No. Docket Nos. 44, 45, Calendar Nos. 42,768, 42,769PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

In these consolidated cases plaintiffs are owners of certain servient farm lands in Caledonia township, Kent county, which are burdened with the natural flow of surface water from the adjacent upper or dominant estates of the defendants. Plaintiffs filed similar bills of complaint in the chancery court to enjoin defendants from draining additional water upon the lands of plaintiffs by means of subsurface tile drains. The cases were consolidated for hearing, the circuit judge dismissed the suits, and plaintiffs appeal. The single question for review is the same in both cases:

“May an upper farm…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gregory v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Peacock v. StinchcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Yerex v. EinederMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Miller v. ZahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Morris Building Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Kernen v. Homestead Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Bennett v. County of EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Kraft v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API