Legal Opinion

Smith v. Township of Eaton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1904No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Eaton; Smith, J. Bill by Edgar M. Smith against the township of Eaton and others to restrain the casting of drainage water upon complainant’s land. Prom a decree for complainant, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

Complainant and defendant Puffenberger are adjacent owners of land in Eaton county. Complainant’s land lies to the north of Puffenberger’s land, said tracts being separated by an east and west highway. • Lying east of Puffenberger’s land, and separated therefrom by a north and south highway, is a tract of land belonging to one Gibbs. The natural slope of this last tract is towards the west, and therefore all the surface water from said Gibbs’ land is carried down onto the highway, and formerly, through a sluice under the north and south highway, upon and over Puffenberger’s land,- Lying to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cubit v. O'DettMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Davis v. Township of FrankenlustMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bruggink v. ThomasMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bennett v. County of EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Peacock v. StinchcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Elliott v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Dean v. MillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Township of Merritt v. HarpMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API