Legal Opinion

City of Mountain Brook v. Beatty

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1974No. SC 215, 215-XPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFLIN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal of a suit seeking injunctive relief and damages. The complainants-appellees-cross appellants Beattys (Complainants) allege that the respondent-appellant-cross appellee City of Mountain Brook (Respondent) has dumped water and will continue to dump even more water on the property of the complainants by virtue of a proposed new storm drainage pipe. Complainants sought and obtained temporary and permanent injunctive relief precluding further construction on the proposed new pipe, and also sought a declaration of the rights of the parties with regard to the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fitts v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Roundtree v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Birch v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Goble v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Stearnes v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Hendrix v. CreelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. City of Birmingham v. City of FairfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. City of Montgomery v. CouturierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Sargent v. Lambert Const. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API