Legal Opinion

Cayford v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1907No. Civ. No. 272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action brought to recover upon, a policy of life insurance. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff; upon which judgment was entered. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied, and from the judgment and order denying its motion for a new trial the defendant prosecutes this appeal.

This case has once been before the supreme court upon an appeal taken from an order sustaining a demurrer. {Cayford v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 144 Cal. 763, [78 Pac. 258].)

The policy in question was issued on the life of Richard N. Cayford, plaintiff’s husband, payable to plaintiff as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Iowa Life Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Knarston v. Manhattan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Westerfeld v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Knarston v. Manhattan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bank of Commerce v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Sharman v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Belden v. Union Central Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Burch v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API