Burch v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.
The question of law presented by the record is whether the local agent of defendant was authorized to extend credit to the insured in the payment of premium due on 17 July, 1929, and thus keep the policy alive.
At the outset it must be borne in mind that there is a vital and fundamental distinction between liability arising from agreements made by an agent of an insurance company at the- inception of the contract and that arising from agreements made by the agent with the insured after tbe contract bas taken effect, resulting in tbe modification of tbe terms and conditions of tbe written…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Iowa Life Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Home Insurance v. GilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Wytheville Ins. & Banking Co. v. TeigerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
- Bank of Commerce v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Foscue v. Greensboro Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Life & Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee v. Margaret W. GurleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- North Carolina Bank & Trust Co. v. Pilot Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Life & Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee v. Margaret W. GurleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Life & Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee v. Margaret W. GurleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956