Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Petitioner, insurance company, seeks an annulment of an award of respondent commission reforming and enforcing as reformed a workmen’s compensation insurance policy, whereby the widow of the deceased workman, a relative of the employer, was allowed death benefits.
Prior to August 1, 1946, E. C. Cornish and Eoland T. Schultz were partners in a business venture. A policy of workmen’s compensation insurance was issued to the partnership and to the partners jointly but not severally, running from January 22, 1946, to January 22, 1947, covering all of their employees. On the subject of whether…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Forward v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Reed v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Westerfeld v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fields v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Zito v. Firemen's Insurance of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Board of Trustees v. MetzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Fields v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985