Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Feghali

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 9, 1991No. 90SA87PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

In January, 1987, appellants Emile Fe-ghali and Sirvart Feghali, husband and wife, were driving separate vehicles and were involved in an accident between the two vehicles. The Feghalis resided in the same household and the automobiles were insured by appellee Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) under the same policy. Mr. Feghali filed suit against Ms. Fe-ghali, alleging injuries and seeking damages resulting from the accident. Allstate filed a complaint for declaratory judgment, seeking a determination that it had no duty to defend or indemnify Ms. Feghali because of a “household…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Huizar v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. Peterman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API