Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, P.C.

Franz and Ingeborg Scholz appeal the district court’s ruling reducing the amount of damages awarded by a jury for noneco-nomic and derivative losses pursuant to the Health Care Availability Act (“HCAA”), sections 13-64-101 to -503, 6A C.R.S. (1992 Supp.), refusing to award prejudgment interest for future damages, and refusing to award all actual costs alleged to have been incurred by plaintiffs subsequent to defendant’s refusal of a settlement offer.1 We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

In 1989, Franz Scholz developed a bladder problem. Scholz was examined by Dr. Myron Yakely, a specialist…