Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. Young

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1932No. 24099. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action was brought by the city of Tacoma for the purpose of attempting to impress a trust upon a fund in the possession of the receiver of the Cascade Paper Company. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the city was not entitled to the relief sought. Judgment was entered allowing the city’s claim as a general claim, but denying to it the right of preference claimed, and from this judgment the city appeals.

The facts essential to be stated are these: The Cascade Paper Company was a corporation which owned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Horstmann Co. v. WatermanWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. McCormacks, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Zioncheck v. HepdenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Lian v. HuglenWashington Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cascade Timber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Moran v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API