Horstmann Co. v. Waterman
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered June 9, 1917, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court. ’
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
— The plaintiff, John Horstmann Company, a corporation, seeks recovery from the defendant, S. K. Waterman, balances due upon the purchase price of goods sold and delivered by it and its assignor to the Lithocrete Company, a corporation; recovery being sought upon the theory that the defendant has become liable to the plaintiff for the payment of such balances under her guaranty contract. Trial in the superior court for King county without a jury resulted in findings and- judgment awarding to the *19plaintiff recovery as prayed for, from'which, the defendant has appealed to this court.
Prior to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gottstein v. ListerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Washburn v. Interstate Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Montgomery v. RiefUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- German State Bank v. Northwestern Water & Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Wilson v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stover v. Winston Bros. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Cascade Timber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
- Priestley v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Forsyth v. New York Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.