Legal Opinion
First National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Trust Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1935No. 25546. Department OnePublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought by Anna E. Hill, an incompetent, through the guardian of her estate, to recover upon a claim filed with the defendant, as the executor of the estate of Samuel Hill, deceased, and by it rejected.
In the complaint, there are three causes of action, separately stated. The first is based upon a written contract dated April 8, 1918, the second upon a similar contract dated April 19, 1922, and a supplemental contract dated April 11, 1927.- The third was based upon a contract dated July 22, 1922. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff on the third cause of action, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keller v. AshfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Murray v. O'BrienWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Lenz v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Horstmann Co. v. WatermanWashington Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Green River Valley Foundation, Inc. v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Ingalls Iron Works Co. v. IngallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Brackett v. SchaferWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Franklin v. Northern Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Rains v. WalbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.