Zioncheck v. Hepden
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
By this action the plaintiff seeks to recover upon a promise made for her benefit, but not to her’ The cause was tried to the court and a jury and resulted in a verdict against the defendants James Hepden and Charles I. Neff in the sum of $1,505.35. Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and in the alternative for a new trial was interposed and overruled. Judgment was entered upon the verdict from which Hepden and Neff appeal.
The preliminary facts may be summarized as follows: A partnership composed of P. B. Groshong, William J. Nadeau and C. J. Kneeland, the latter being a silent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union Machinery & Supply Co. v. DarnellWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Bartels v. McCulloughOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Hart v. BogleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grand Lodge of Scandinavian Fraternity of America, District No. 7 v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Stover v. Winston Bros. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Cascade Timber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Olson v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Black v. YoderWashington Supreme Court · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.