Legal Opinion

Lian v. Huglen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1926No. 20133. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

John Lian and four others, including Theo. Sunsby as foreman of a fishing crew, had fished several years for the Eyak River Cannery in Alaska. The same, crew was employed about December, 1923, or January, 1924, to fish at the same place during the season of 1924, for the going wage. On March 6,1924, the defendant Alme Huglen bought the Eyak River •Cannery and equipment. It was then getting late in the season for fishermen to get other employment of that kind and, in order to protect those who had been engaged by it, tbe cannery company, on making the sale to Hnglen, took from him his written…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ShueyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Kelly & Brodock v. GreenoughWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grand Lodge of Scandinavian Fraternity of America, District No. 7 v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Jeffery v. HansonWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. City of Tacoma v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API