Legal Opinion

McCormacks, Inc. v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1932No. 23792. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerman, J.

— The defendant city of Tacoma, a municipal corporation, is the owner and operator of both an electric light and power plant and a water system. In 1916, McCormack Bros. Co., a corporation, filed written application to be furnished with water and electricity for the premises occuped by it in Tacoma. John S. Baker Investment Co., a corporation, the in-tervener herein, was then and still is the owner of those premises. Electricity and water were furnished continuously by the city of Tacoma from 1916 until McCormack Bros. Co. was adjudged insolvent, and a receiver was appointed to wind up its…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of East Grand Forks v. LuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Locke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Locke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Lake Stevens Sewer District v. Village Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API