Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 2010No. 2009-1816PublishedCited by 177 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The superintendent of insurance for the state of Ohio, Mary Jo Hudson, acting in the capacity as liquidator of the Oil & Gas Insurance Company (“OGICO”), appeals from a judgment of the Tenth District Court of Appeals that reversed a grant of summary judgment in favor of the superintendent on a declaratory-judgment action and held that the superintendent had no authority to pay interest to creditors and claimants of OGICO before paying the shareholders of OGICO.

{¶ 2} The issue presented on this appeal is whether the liquidator may pay interest to the insurer’s creditors and other…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. LoweOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Portage County Board of Commissioners v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by177 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Argabrite v. NeerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State Ex Rel. American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. Cuyahoga County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Doss v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Taylor v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011

172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API