Bing v. Thunig
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFinn, J.
Following Schloendorff v. New York Hosp. (211 N. Y. 125), a body of law has developed making the liability of a hospital for injuries suffered by a patient, through the negligence of its employees, depend on whether the injury-producing act was “administrative” or “medical.” The wisdom and workability of this rule exempting hospitals from *659the normal operation of the doctrine of respondeat superior have in recent years come under increasing attack. Decision in the present case calls upon us to say whether the rule should longer endure.
The plaintiff, Isabel Bing, was severely burned during the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- McDonald v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1953
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by243 opinions
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Hill v. St. Clare's HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Paintsville Hospital Co. v. RoseKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.