Legal Opinion

Natl. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. Wuerth

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2009No. 2008-1334PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has certified one question of state law for our resolution: “Under Ohio law, can a legal malpractice claim be maintained directly against a law firm when all of the relevant principals and employees have either been dismissed from the lawsuit or were never sued in the first instance?”

{¶ 2} We answer the certified question in the negative and hold that a law firm does not engage in the practice of law and therefore cannot commit legal malpractice directly and that a law firm is not vicariously liable for legal malpractice unless…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bello v. ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Abshure v. Methodist Healthcare-Memphis HospitalsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. James Gaston v. Parthasarathi GhoshCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Lundeen v. GraffOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Sacksteder v. SenneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Dottore v. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API