Berry v. Bank of Bakersfield
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendant, Bank of Bakersfield, appeals from a judgment against it, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The complaint alleges that on February 1, 1911, the plaintiff, H. F. Berry, deposited with the defendant bank, as security for the payment of a fourteen thousand dollar note executed by him to the bank, a certificate for 82,144 shares of the capital stock of the Black Jack Oil Company. Said shares were held by H. F. Berry as trustee for himself and the other plaintiffs, the certificate being in the name of H. F. Berry, trustee. It is alleged, further, that the defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hicks v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In re the Estate of RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Kornec v. Mike Horse Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947
- Collins v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.