Legal Opinion

Collins v. Sargent

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1928No. Docket No. 4700PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAZLETT, J., pro tem.

This is an action for injunction to restrain defendants (appellants) from using explosives and blasting in a gravel-pit adjacent to plaintiff’s home. The record does not show that any temporary restraining order was issued. On the trial plaintiff was given judgment perpetually restraining defendants from using explosives in or about the gravel-pit, and defendants appeal.

The issues were joined by plaintiff’s amended complaint, and defendants’ answer thereto filed April 20, 1923. As affirmative matters of defense defendants allege: That since September 28, 1922, defendant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bloomquist v. . FarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Jenkins v. EldredgeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1845
  5. Grisby v. Clear Lake Water Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1870

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Branch Naacp v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Phillips v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Ellis v. American Federation of LaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API