In re the Estate of Rose
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Tulare County settling the account of an administrator of the estate of a deceased person. Motion to dismiss appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion of;the- court.
1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal upon the ground that it-.was prematurely taken.
It appears from the. affidavits, on file that on the 12th of March, 1887, .findings-of • fact and an order or decree were signed and filed with the clerk, settling the account of H. Hirshfield, the. administrator of the estate of Rose, deceased. Afterward, .and on the twenty-seventh day of April, 1887, the administrator perfected an appeal to this -court from such order or decree.
At the time of -taking such appeal, the decree appealed from .had not been entered in the minute-book of the Superior Court of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McLaughlin v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Thomas v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by24 opinions
- William A. Goichman, on Behalf of Himself and a Class of All Persons Similarly Situated v. Rheuban Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Walker v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.