Legal Opinion

Leisle v. Welfare Building & Loan Ass'n

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The evidence adduced at the trial is rather limited considering the nature of the controversy. The following facts, however, seem to be without dispute: On November 1, 1928, one Louis B. Shapiro applied in writing to the defendant for a mortgage loan of $25,000, using one of the defendant’s application blanks. The real estate was not specifically described. In answer to the question: “Is there a building on the lot?” the applicant stated: “Will be.” In answer to the question: “Number of rooms ?” the applicant stated: “8 — 4 R Apts.” In answer to the question: “Garage on lot?” the applicant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peninsular Stove Co. v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. La Crosse Super Auto Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Thomsen v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hook v. BoltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. Jennings v. VaheyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Premonstratensian Fathers v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Scalzo v. MarshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Eastman v. DefreesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API