Leisle v. Welfare Building & Loan Ass'n
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The evidence adduced at the trial is rather limited considering the nature of the controversy. The following facts, however, seem to be without dispute: On November 1, 1928, one Louis B. Shapiro applied in writing to the defendant for a mortgage loan of $25,000, using one of the defendant’s application blanks. The real estate was not specifically described. In answer to the question: “Is there a building on the lot?” the applicant stated: “Will be.” In answer to the question: “Number of rooms ?” the applicant stated: “8 — 4 R Apts.” In answer to the question: “Garage on lot?” the applicant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Peninsular Stove Co. v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Standard Oil Co. v. La Crosse Super Auto Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Thomsen v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Hook v. BoltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Jennings v. VaheyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Premonstratensian Fathers v. Badger Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Scalzo v. MarshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Eastman v. DefreesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945