Legal Opinion
Peninsular Stove Co. v. Young
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 8, 1929No. Docket No. 117, Calendar No. 34,442PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
Plaintiff here' seeks by cross-bill to enforce a lien upon an apartment building erected by defendants Young and Taan for the price of 49 gas ranges which were installed therein. These ranges were delivered on the premises by the plaintiff, and were installed by employees of the defendants by placing them against the walls in the several apartments and connecting them with a gas fixture which had been placed therein. Plaintiff appeals from the decree entered dismissing its cross-bill.
3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 14796 (mechanics’ lien law), provides that—
“Every person who shall, in pursuance ,of any…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Turner v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Morris v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Hanson v. VoseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Union Stove Works v. KlingmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Porch v. Agnew Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Velmer v. Baraga Area SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re Slum Clearance Between Hastings, De Quindre, Mullett Streets and Gratiot AvenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Michigan National Bank v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sequist v. FabianoMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.