Premonstratensian Fathers v. Badger Mutual Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
Although the insurers have divided their argument into two sections, the basis of the entire appeal is a consideration of the legal status of the coolers. If the coolers are determined to be common-law fixtures, and were such at the time of the construction of the building and the installation of the coolers, then they would have passed to the Fathers under the warranty deed of March 7, 1960, and they would be insured under the terms of the policy. The issue then is whether these coolers constitute fixtures.
The rule which has developed in Wisconsin as to what constitutes a fixture is not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Gisholt Machine Co. v. NorsmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Standard Oil Co. v. La Crosse Super Auto Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Gunderson v. SwarthoutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Hannon v. KellyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Shields v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Tri-Tech Corp. of America v. Americomp Services, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee v. The Federal Land Bank of St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Wayne County v. Britton TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Prospecting Unlimited, Inc. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.