Legal Opinion

Eastman v. Defrees

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 9, 1945No. 46608PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMulroney, J.

The plaintiffs were the owners of a mansion-type house, in the city of Des Moines, which had^been converted into seven apartments. On October 1, 1941, they entered into a contract to sell the house to the defendant H. L. DeFrees. There were actually two contracts executed by the parties on this date, identical in form.and differing only in the amount of consideration. Without delving too deeply into the confusing financial dealings of these parties, it is enough to say that the second contract, with the increased consideration, was made necessary because DeFrees received a portion of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ottumwa Woolen Mill Co. v. HawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Cornell College v. CrainSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Leisle v. Welfare Building & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fulton v. ChaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  2. Hansen v. ChapinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Keokuk State Bank v. EckleyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984
  4. Miles Homes, Inc. of Iowa v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  5. Goodale v. BraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API