Legal Opinion

Thomsen v. Cullen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1928PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed May 8, 1928:

Rosenberry, J.

The case presented here includes over a thousand pages of printed matter. There are nearly four hundred pages of briefs. We regard the amount of printing presented in this case in this court as entirely unjustifiable and being an unwarranted expense to parties. It is not in accordance with the rule and we feel that it should not be passed without comment.

In view of the decision reached, we are not called upon to consider the matter so far as it relates to the taxation of costs.

There are three principal questions raised in this case:

I.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Thomas v. Western Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. People v. . American Loan Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. A. O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. La Crosse Super Auto Service, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Wynn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Graham v. PerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API