Legal Opinion

Moulter v. City of Grand Rapids

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1908No. Docket No. 103PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to the superior court of Grand Rapids; Stuart, J. Case by Hannah M. Moulter against the city of Grand Rapids for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This suit was brought to recover for injuries received from a fall alleged to have been caused by a defective sidewalk in defendant city, on the 18th day of June, 1906. At the time of plaintiff’s injury, the charter of the city (Act No. 593, Local Acts 1905, tit. 16, §§ 5, 6) contained the following provisions:

“Sec. 485. If any claim for unliquidated'damages is made against said city for injuries to persons or property by reason of any defects in the sidewalks, streets, highways, cross-walks, bridges, alleys, courts, public grounds or public places in said city, or by reason of any negligence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crocker v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  2. Van Auken v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Davis v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Ellis v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Miller v. Village of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Reich v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. McCAHAN v. BRENNANMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Grubaugh v. City of St. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Sherfey v. City of BrazilIndiana Supreme Court · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API