Legal Opinion

Miller v. Village of Birmingham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1906No. Docket No. 86PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Case by Arabella A. Miller against the village of Birmingham for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff recovered in a suit for personal injuries received from a fall caused by a defective sidewalk. The injury occurred while she was walking upon a sidewalk along a street of defendant village, which sidewalk she claims defendant negligently allowed to remain out of repair. A loose plank tripped her and caused her to fall, which, she claims, severely and permanently injured her left arm. Within the 60 days provided by law she filed a notice of her claim with the proper officer. It was referred to -the committee on claims which afterwards re*471ported to the council without any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Renackowsky v. Board of Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Griswold v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Holtham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Moinet v. Burnham, Stoepel & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Van Auken v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bostrom v. JenningsMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Moulter v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Chapman v. BuderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Johnson v. City of ChisholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API