Legal Opinion

McCAHAN v. BRENNAN

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2012No. Docket 142765PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.

In Rowland v Washtenaw County Road Commission,1 this Court held that, it being the sole province of the Legislature to determine whether and on what terms the state may be sued, the judiciary has no authority to restrict or amend those terms. We take this opportunity to reaffirm and apply this fundamental principle articulated in Rowland to the interpretation of MCL 600.6431, the notice provision of the Court of Claims Act at issue in this case.

The Court of Appeals correctly determined that when the Legislature conditions the ability to pursue a claim against the state on a plaintiffs having…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Reich v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. S. Dearborn Envtl. Improvement Ass'n, Inc. v. Dep't of Envtl. QualityMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. In re MedinaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Michelle Renee Fairley v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API