Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of Adrian

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1907No. Docket No. 13PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Lenawee; Shepherd, J., presiding. Case by Garfield Davis against the city of Adrian for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant for injuries received by him caused by his falling through an opening in the sidewalk from which the grating had been removed. The defendant has brought the case here by writ of error.

The assignments of error may be grouped as follows:(1) That the notice given to the city of the claim of plaintiff is insufficient.(2) The admission of a photograph in evidence.(3) The exclusion of an entry in the books of the contractor who was doing the repairs on the building in the course of which the grating was removed.(4) Failure to give certain…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Archer v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Alberts v. Village of VernonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Campbell v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. De CampMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Samberg v. Knights of the Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Moulter v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Perri v. TassieMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Boughner v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API