Legal Opinion
LOL Finance Co. v. Romain Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 14, 1984No. C4-84-396PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Appellants Romain Corporation, Joseph E. Romain and Charles E. Hunter allege the trial court erred by denying its motion for amendment of their joint answer. We affirm.'
FACTS
In 1980, appellant, Romain Corporation, purchased a turkey growing operation and on or about January 9, 1981, entered into a financing and security agreement with Land O’Lakes wherein Land O’Lakes agreed to advance certain funds to Romain for use in its turkey operations and Romain agreed to buy various supplies and process their turkeys with Land O’Lakes. Romain agreed to repay all advances…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Warrick v. GironSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Peterson v. SorlienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Dale Ex Rel. Smith v. PushorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Sheehan v. St. Peter's Catholic SchoolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Rehberger v. Project Plumbing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shea v. Hanna Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Metag v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- In re the Condemnation of Certain Lands ex rel. City of White Bear Lake Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- LaPanta v. HeidelbergerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.