Legal Opinion
State v. Baxter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 14, 2004No. A04-676PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
The state appeals from a pretrial order denying its motion to amend the complaint to add two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and to change one of the original counts of third-degree criminal sexual conduct to criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, arguing that the denial has a critical impact on the outcome of the trial and that the district court clearly-erred. We affirm.
FACTS
The state alleges that on several specific occasions from January 1990 to February 1991, respondent Paul Baxter engaged in sexual intercourse with a minor female. At the time of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BernardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. v. City of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Peterson v. 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Vin: 2FAHP74WX4X158445Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- BRIDGEWATER TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC. v. City of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009