Legal Opinion
Metag v. K-Mart Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 22, 1986No. C8-85-2159PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
This action arose out of injuries appellant Ronald T. Metag sustained when a lashing strap purchased from respondent K-Mart Corporation broke and struck him in the eye. The complaint, served on October 30, 1981, alleged claims for strict liability, breach of express and implied warranties, negligence, breach of contract, and res ipsa loquitur. On September 9, 1985, appellant moved to amend his complaint to include a prayer for punitive damages and to allege violations of the Minnesota uniform deceptive trade practices act, the prevention of consumer fraud act, and the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacobs v. Rosemount Dodge-Winnebago SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Utecht v. Shopko Department StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Warrick v. GironSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- McDonald v. StonebrakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- LOL Finance Co. v. Romain Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- Porous Media Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pall Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Swanlund v. Shimano Indus. Corp., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- McKenzie v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Minneapolis Police Department v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- LeDoux v. Northwest Publishing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.