Legal Opinion

LaPanta v. Heidelberger

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 1986No. CX-86-147Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

This dispute arises out of a contract for the sale of Minnesota Tire Recycling, Inc. (MTR), a corporation engaged in the business of stockpiling and shredding used rubber tires. Respondent Milton LaPanta brought this action on his own behalf and on behalf of MTR, seeking specific performance of an earnest money agreement he had entered into with the shareholders of MTR, Robert Sayers and appellants Cecil and Patricia Heidelberger. The Heidel-bergers commenced a separate action seeking cancellation of the earnest money agreement, alleging LaPanta was insolvent and unable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Northern States Power Co. v. Lyon Food Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Flynn v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. State v. SimonsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API