Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. State Board of Equalization
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
Over the protest of petitioner, respondent State Board of Equalization has granted a license to the California Avenue Pharmacy at Palo Alto to sell intoxicating liquors. Petitioner contends that such action is illegal and the license void because issued in direct violation of the provisions of section 172a of the Penal Code, which prohibits the sale of intoxicating liquor within one and one-half miles of the grounds or campus of Stanford University. Petitioner is here seeking a writ of review of the action of the respondent board, and that the order granting and issuing the license be set…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cheney v. CoughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Traffic Truck Sales Co. v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- A. G. Col Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Matter of Petition of BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- State Ex Rel. First National Bank of Wisconsin Rapids v. M & I Peoples Bank of ColomaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.