Legal Opinion

Harding v. Harding

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1905No. 222PublishedCited by 104 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The facts are stated in the opinion. This court has jurisdiction to review the ruling of the Supreme Court of California upon this writ of error.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The facts are stated in the opinion. This court has jurisdiction to review the ruling of the Supreme Court of California upon this writ of error. Andrews v. Andrews, 188 U. S. 14; Atherton v. Atherton, 181 U. S. 155; Bell v. Bell, 181 U. S. 175; Streitwolf v. Streitwolf, 181 U. S. 179; Lynde v. Lynde, 181 U. S. 183; Water Co. v. Railroad Co., 172 U. S. 475; Bank v. Stevens, 169 U. S. 432; Huntington v. Attrill, 146 U. S. 657; Gt. W. Tel. Co. v. Purdy, 162 U. S. 329. This case comes within the second clause of § 709, because there is drawn…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The law of Illinois (Laws of Illinois, 1877, p. 115) provided as follows:

“That married women who, without their fault, now live or hereafter may live, separate and apart from their husbands, may have their remedy in equity in their own names, respectively, against their said husbands for a reasonable support and maintenance while they so live separate or have so lived separately and apart; and in determining the amount to be. allowed the court shall have reference to the condition of the parties in life, and the circumstances of the respective cases; and the court may grant allowance to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Thompson v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Gay v. ParpartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Harding v. HardingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Interdynamics, Inc., and Smiths Industries, Limited v. Firma Wolf, Arend Wolf, and Trans Tech, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Keystone Building Corp. v. Lincoln Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API