Legal Opinion

Morris v. Ohio Casualty Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1988No. 87-287PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The sole question posed for our consideration is whether an insurance carrier may be liable for conversion when the carrier authorizes its bank to pay a draft over a forged endorsement. For the reasons expressed infra, we answer the question in the affirmative and, accordingly, uphold the decision of the court of appeals.

It is axiomatic that a motion for *47summary judgment may only be granted where there exists no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Civ. R. 56(C). Moreover, summary judgment is inappropriate unless it appears…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Toledo's Great Eastern Shoppers City, Inc. v. Abde's Black Angus Steak House No. III, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Wills v. Frank Hoover SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Hoyt, Inc. v. Gordon & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Ashcroft v. Mount Sinai Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Brown v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Wachovia Bank of Delaware, N.A. v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Rigby v. Fallsway Equipment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API