Chamberlain v. Bob Matick Chevrolet, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKosicki, J.
The complaint in this action, as amended, alleged a breach of warranty by the defendant in the sale of a used automobile and sought relief by rescission or by recovery of damages. The finding of the court, whieh is not subject to correction except as made of our own motion and hereinafter set out, shows the following facts: In the *687summer of 1965, Christopher Komisarjevsky, age twenty, a student at Union College, wanted to buy a secondhand or used car for himself. He and his mother, Ernestine Chamberlain, the plaintiff in this action, visited between five and ten car lots. Eventually he came…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Clark v. HaggardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Flies v. Fox Brothers Buick Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Egan Chevrolet Co. v. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Overland Bond & Investment Corp. v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Testo v. Russ Dunmire Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Turner v. International Harvester CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Patton v. McHoneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.