Legal Opinion

Comstock v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1959No. Docket 10, Calendar 47,447PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

This is another appeal wherein a plaintiff seeks reversal because he has been denied the opportunity for jury trial and verdict on a claim of negligent injury. In this instance the trial judge thought there was evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant concerned. He directed a verdict, however, because he considered that the effect of any negligence on the defendant’s part had been terminated by an intervening act of another party.

This action was filed by an injured garage employee against the owner, the driver, and the maker of the Buick automobile which struck him. Plaintiff had…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  4. Ford Motor v. WagonerTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Lovejoy v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. ZenobiaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API