Legal Opinion

Double v. Double

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1967No. Civ. 29412PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobey, J.

This is an appeal 1 from an order denying appellant’s motion for termination of his permanent alimony obligation of $100 a month to respondent, his former wife, and granting to her counsel, without request therefor, $100 attorney’s fees. 2

The basis of appellant’s motion was a claim that respondent had been living for some time with one Thomas Mowry in a meretricious relationship. In this connection the evidence taken at the hearing of the matter showed that Mowry did live with respondent for about six months before the hearing, and during this period he slept with her occasionally and paid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dean v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ralphs v. RalphsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Grant v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Harper v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Burdick v. BurdickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rader v. ThrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. In Re Marriage of ClementsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Edwards v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. In Re Marriage of LudwigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. In Re Marriage of MaunderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API