Legal Opinion

Harper v. Murray

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1920No. S. F. No. 8659PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. 'Win. M. Abbott, Wm. M. Cannon and Kingsley Cannon for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

The complaint in this action sets forth that plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife; that they were divorced and that by the decree of divorce the plaintiff was restored her maiden name of Rose Harper, and was given judgment against defendant for alimony in the sum of one hundred dollars per month until further order of the court; that subsequently defendant obtained an order of court discharging said defendant from further payment of alimony; that such release was obtained through a purported agreement signed by plaintiff whereby, in consideration of a promissory note for three…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Camas Stage Co. v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Rubenstein v. RubensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. Garlinger v. GarlingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  5. Hall v. Department of AdoptionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API